Contents |
Misc. Archosauromorphs of the Chinle Formation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Species | State | Member | Abundance | Notes | Images |
C. harrisae[1] |
|
|
Represented by teeth.[1] Treated as indeterminate archosauriform remains by Irmis in 2005.[1] |
|||
Tanytrachelos[2] |
Indeterminate[2] |
|
|
Represented by a single cervical rib.[2] |
||
T. murryi[3] |
|
|
Represented by scattered teeth formerly believed to be from an ornithischian dinosaur.[3] Later discoveries of similar teeth in pseudosuchians meant that these could no longer be regarded as anything more specific than some kind of archosauriform.[3] |
|||
T. buettneri[5] |
|
|
||||
T. dornorum[6] |
|
|
||||
T. jacobsi[7] |
|
|||||
V. campi[8] |
|
A strange aquatic carnivore of uncertain affinities that is represented by both articulated skeletons and scattered elements like osteoderms and vertebrae.[8] |
Misc. Amniotes of the Chinle Formation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Species | State | Member | Abundance | Notes | Images |
A. rectori[9] |
|
|
Known only from a partial skull.[9] |
A strange reptile whose bones were heavily ornamented "with subtriangular knobs... running the length of the bones." Even these ornamentations were ornamented "with additional grooves." It is too bizarre to be currently classified as anything more than a probable diapsid.[9] |
||
C. obscurus[10] |
|
|
Known only from a jaw fragment and some isolated teeth.[10] |
Originally believed to be a fish, Colognathus had distinct, fluted teeth.[10] |
||
Kraterokheirodon[11] |
K. colberti[11] |
|
Known only from two teeth.[11] |
Although they share some similarities with cynodont teeth, the known Kraterokheirodon teeth are very distinctive and can't be confidently referred to a known amniote group.[11] |
||
P. hesternus[12] |
|
Known from several hundred remains, but very rare outside of the highly concentrated Placerias Quarry.[12] It was likely uncommon in its ecosystem and the large numbers of specimens in the Placerias Quarry attributable to "taphonomic processes."[12] |
||||
Indeterminate[14] |
|
|
Only a single tooth.[14] |
The Chinle tooth referred to cf. Uatchitodon sp. possesses "longitudinal canals" leading from the base of the tooth to a hole near the tip, which probably conducted venom in life.[14] The presence of venom channels is consistent with other known Uatchitodon specimens, although the Chinle specimen's channels are unique in being "completely enclosed under the surface of the crown."[14] This opens the possibility that the Chinle "Uatchitodon" may actually represent a new, unknown species of venomous Triassic reptile.[14] |
Color key
|
Notes Uncertain or tentative data are in small text; |
Amphibians of the Chinle Formation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Species | State | Member | Abundance | Notes | Images |
A. gregorii[15] |
|
Common in the Owl Rock and Petrified forest members.[15] Blue Mesa remains are fragmentary.[15] |
||||
K. perfecta[17] |
|
K. perfecta is "possibly the most common tetrapod fossil in the lower Chinle", although its presence in the upper Chinle is "unclear".[17] |
The new genus Koskinonodon was erected for the species "Buettneria" perfecta when it was discovered that the latter genus was preoccupied.[16] |
Chondrichthyans of the Chinle Formation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Species | State | Stratigraphic position | Abundance | Notes | Images |
Indeterminate[18] |
|
Only a single tooth is known.[18] |
||||
Lonchidion[20] |
L. humblei[20] |
|
Lonchidion remains are common through-out the Carnian microvertebrate sites of the American southwest.[20] |
|||
Phoebodus[21] |
Indeterminate[21] |
|
|
Only a single specimen has been recovered from the formation.[21] |
||
Reticulodus[22] |
R. synergus[22] |
|
The crown of its tooth bears a "reticulating ornamentation on [its] occlusal surface[.]"[22] Reticulodus remains are common through-out the Norian microvertebrate sites of the American southwest.[22] |
|||
X. moorei[23] |
|
Common in the lower Chinle Formation's microvertebrate localities.[23] |
Actinistians of the Chinle Formation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Species | State | Stratigraphic position | Abundance | Notes | |
Indeterminate[25] |
|
Color key
|
Notes Uncertain or tentative data are in small text; |
Dipnoans of the Chinle Formation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Species | State | Abundance | Notes | Notes | |
A. dorotheae[26] |
||||||
Indeterminate[26] |
|
Arganodus toothplates are the most common fossil in the formation from a non-tetrapod.[26] They are evenly distributed across strata, although some individual localities have very high concentrations.[26] |
Most Chinlean Arganodus fossils are isolated tooth plates.[26] |
|||
C. dorotheae[26] |
Named by Case in 1921, in the 1980s it was referred to Arganodus.[26] |
Actinopterygians of the Chinle Formation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Species | State | Stratigraphic position | Abundance | Notes | Images |
Indeterminate[28] |
|
|
Known only from two vertebrae.[28] |
|||
Lasalichthyes[29] |
Indeterminate[30] |
|
Represented by isolated scales.[30] |
|||
Turseodus[31] |
Indeterminate[32] |
|
Common.[32] |
Isolated scales from Chinle microvertebrate sites commonly have Turseodus-like ridges, however that feature is not unique to Turseodus and in 2005 Irmis advised researchers to regard them as indeterminate palaeoniscid remains.[32] |